Jake Paul faced backlash after revealing he wanted to respond to Druschi’s comedy by using blackface.
Jake Paul has always stayed away from controversy these days, but now he’s about to put his chin in the crosshairs of every black fighter.
This is the third rail of culture, and its name is “vomiting.” You must be of a certain age to know this reference. Even Jack’s most loyal supporters find his actions difficult to defend. The YouTuber-turned-boxer recently floated an idea to respond to Druski’s viral comedy skit in the most ill-advised way possible.
During a recent appearance on Theo Von’s podcast, Jack revealed that he had been seriously considering a parody reaction involving blackface. Yes, you read that right. According to Jakester, he has already started calling makeup artists.
“I’ve been calling my makeup artist for the past few days,” he admits. “I intend to respond to this and comprehensively…”
When Feng asked, “Darker?” Paul confirmed with a simple “Yes,” hinting that he was ready to go all-in on the matter. I watched it several times and it didn’t look like he would attempt such a stupid move. Please see below.
View this post on Instagram
Now, if you know anything about American cultural history, you already know why this idea is radioactive. “Blackface” isn’t just edgy comedy. It carries a deeply painful legacy associated with minstrel shows and racist caricatures that most entertainers with even rudimentary PR instincts know to avoid. Theo Von even seemed to understand this minefield, suggesting that if Paul even attempted such a thing, he might need to work with a respected black artist to soften the blow. Jack had no idea.
“This is too bad,” Paul said. “If we have to work with someone, doesn’t that make us more prejudiced? Drusky just dropped this. I fucking love it. It’s awesome. That’s how humans should be. We should fucking make fun of each other. And I don’t see color. I see truth and comedy. So what are we talking about? What era are we living in?”
“I can’t see color.”
The discussion also touched on past blackface controversies involving public figures such as Justin Trudeau and Jimmy Kimmel. I mean, this doesn’t end well. Cakejack even joked that the photo of Kimmel in blackface looked like Shaquille O’Neal, adding another layer of awkwardness to the conversation. Brother, read the room
As of now, Druski has not responded, and I don’t think he will. He has yet to respond. Jack didn’t seem to move forward with the idea. The controversy remains and he has our attention. Mission accomplished.
Since Jake Paul doesn’t read, here’s a history lesson. 👀
history lesson
Blackface in the American entertainment industry dates back to the early 19th century, when white performers darkened their skin with burnt cork or greasepaint to depict exaggerated racist stereotypes of black people in minstrel shows. These performances, popular in the 1830s and 1840s, portrayed black Americans as lazy, unintelligent, overly happy, or dangerous, reinforcing harmful narratives during and after slavery. One of the most famous early examples is Thomas D. Rice’s “Jim Crow” character, who was so influential that the name later became synonymous with segregation laws. Even as entertainment evolved into vaudeville, early movies, and radio, blackface remained common and was used in comedy by white stars until the early 20th century. Although some black performers were later admitted to the minstrel circuit, they were often forced to don blackface themselves to conform to the degrading expectations of white audiences. By the mid-20th century, growing civil rights consciousness began to remove blackface from mainstream entertainment, but its legacy remains a painful reminder of how racism was once normalized into popular entertainment.
