Diddy’s attorneys are again asking for a gag order in his sex trafficking case after the New York Post published a report on Friday (October 25) about Diddy’s “freak.” In a letter obtained by AllHipHop, Diddy’s legal team accused the Department of Homeland Security of working with the media to tarnish his reputation.
“The Department of Homeland Security has entered into an unlawful partnership with various news outlets, which the agency has and will exploit to undermine this individual’s ability to receive a fair trial,” Diddy’s attorneys wrote to Arun Sabra Judge Mannion. “The need for an immediate gag order is clear.”
The Washington Post headline read: “Video shows Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs mixing up star-studded bash with raucous ‘Diddy’ Combs after VMAs and Super Bowl game” Freak Off’s Sex Party Integration cites federal law enforcement sources The Washington Post said it reviewed a “vast amount” of video archives and documents for the report.
“These are consistent with the videos we have,” a law enforcement official involved in the “Diddy” investigation told The Washington Post after being briefed on the video description. “Almost everything you can imagine happened at his party. Now our job is to determine if this was consensual by everyone involved, if anyone was trafficked, and what laws were broken.
The Washington Post reportedly viewed videos from the same archive that included footage of Diddy having sex with a “much younger A-list male star.” Someone allegedly tried to sell a sex tape.
“This is disgusting,” a law enforcement source told The Washington Post. “Look, if this was just him having a sex party with a bunch of horny adults, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. It’s perfectly legal. But that’s not what we’re talking about. This man is a predator.
Diddy’s attorney said the source’s comments justified a broad gag order.
“This latest article highlights the need for the court’s order to be appropriately broadened and cover all agents who have direct or indirect access to the video, evidence, case information, or familiarity with the investigation,” Didi’s lawyers argued. “The government’s proposed order would allow this clear misconduct to continue unabated and would protect ‘federal agents involved in the investigation’ from false, destructive, and willful infringements of a defendant’s right to a fair trial.” Implications of the Statement. The persistence of this conduct demonstrates a disregard for the Court’s clear concern with this fundamental issue.
Didi was arrested in September on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transportation for prostitution. He remains behind bars. His trial is scheduled for May 2025.
