After the alleged incident, Deal was asked not to return to court within a few days.
allhiphop.com
Since 1998, Allhiphop.com has pioneered hip-hop news. Get our daily email for exclusive news and weekly digestion, all curated for true hip-hop enthusiasts. Stay connected and learn about the heartbeat of hip-hop culture. Subscribe now!
subscription
Diddy’s former bodyguard, Gene Deal, allegedly attacked a man who harassed him outside of Manhattan Federal Courthouse, where the bad boy record tycoon is currently under trial.
In a video shared by the conversation art, an interviewer reported that the deal had a “dispute” with YouTuber, which was conducted via “D No.” Apparently, D did not call “Uncle Phil” or other nicknames until Deal decided to take action. To be fair, Deal warned D that he would eliminate him if he kept moving forward and he fulfilled his promise.
After the incident, Deal was asked not to return to court within a few days.
View this post on Instagram
Deal has been one of Didi’s most outspoken critics in the federal trial of extortion and sex trafficking that his former boss has been conducting. Deal has publicly shared his experiences, and even wrote a book about his time at Diddy, claiming Diddy used Bad Boy Entertainment to organize illegal gatherings for himself and others known as “freaks”, suggesting that these activities point to blackmail allegations.
In recent interviews, Deal predicted that Didi would not be able to bear the pressure of trial and would eventually “crack” under the weight of testimony and evidence, potentially accepting a plea agreement to end the torture.
Deal stressed that Diddy must be sober and without interference in the court environment is particularly difficult for him.
In addition to these predictions, Deal also claimed that the prosecution was somewhat loose and believed that more charges against Diddy might be filed. He has linked testimony (especially people who describe threats, violence and coercion) to a broader narrative of sexual trafficking and abuse, asserting that Didi’s alleged patterns of behavior go far beyond isolated incidents.
Deal’s willingness to testify and his public statements both attracted support and criticism, with some accusing him of trying to “drag Didi’s name into the mud”, while others view him as a key witness with important internal knowledge. Deal insists that he has substantial evidence to support his claim and says he has no regrets about Diddy’s current legal troubles and insists that the consequences are the result of Diddy’s own actions.
