Nick Kannong Viacom International Inc.
According to the lawsuit, Zeus’s “Bad and Wild” is not only imitations, but also a comprehensive replication of popular hip -hop improvised comedy programs, and is equipped with the same setting design, format, and even the owner himself.
Viadom accused Zeus accusing Zeus blatantly overwhelmed his intellectual property rights.
Zeus intends to copy the wild ‘n elements in development The bad and wild nature, knowing that these behaviors constitute the infringement of Viacom copyright. “George W. George W.
“The cooperation between Zeus and Mr. Kannon is” the long -term host and face of the wild N “. The conclusion of the following conclusions in” Development Poor Development and Wild “is that bad and wild intentionally deprive the wild ‘n to obtain it to obtain it to obtain it to obtain it to obtain it to obtain it Creative elements, without having to do the work of creating the original content itself. “
The lawsuit claims that the bad signature function of the wild, including the two competitors teams, the audience participation, celebrities’ guest appearances, DJ fusion scores and champion prizes-Viacom said, Element (Element) It is a trademark that is undoubted.
The same is true of Nick Cannon and its participation.
The lawsuit claims that his role as the host of “Bad Man and Wildness” directly violates his contract with Viakom, which prohibits him from engaging in projects that compete with the wild or imitate wild competition.
Crup said: “Zeus made Mr. Kannon violated the written agreement related to” Wildness “.”
Viacom Alleges that Zeus Compounded the Damage by Marketing the New Show as a High-Octane version of with, reportedly tagging it as “wild ‘n out on STEROI DS “in Promotional Materials.
In addition, the network is accusing of poor and wild. It is characterized by content. The lawsuit is called harmful and disliked content, such as race and gender stereotypes, clear images and violence glory-away from the Elements of the original show “good humor, “Crup said.
Kroup added: “The damage caused by the interference of Mr. Kannon’s contract was magnified by the wave of negative publicity. “” “
In addition to artillery, the lawsuit also listed several previous wild actors and crew members who are now cooperating with Zeus in the competitive series.
Viacom claims that this cooperation has blurred the boundaries between the two programs, which confuses the audience. They may think that these works are formally affiliated.
The lawsuit seeks permanent ban to prevent BAD and Wild’s production, distribution, and financial losses, including three times the loss of illegal acts.
Viacom also asked Zeus to transfer the profits caused by bad and wild nature and repay all lawyers’ fees.
Zeus Network has not publicly responded to these allegations.
